Sony versus Hotz court case and decision Article

Sony versus Hotz court side and decision - Article ExampleHis hacking also enabled him to have access to the PlayStation 3s processor. It was Hotzs actions that make Sony take him to court. Through the lawsuit, Sony sought to get a temporary restraining order against Hotz. Sony sued Hotz for allegedly violating the Digital Millenium secure Act (DMCA), being involved in decryption of keys, and violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. At some(prenominal) point, the court granted Sony temporary injunction against Hotz. This was to prevent him from making public, information somewhat how he hacked into the PlayStation 3 console. The court also granted Sony the right to know all those who had visited the website of the hacker (Hotz). After a retentive court battle, the matter was finally settled out of court when both parties reached an agreement based on certain terms and conditions. Hotz agreed to stop distributing the files he used to hack into PlayStation 3 and swore non to relieve the same actions ever again (Grazzini, 2011).In my opinion, the ruling whereby Hotz was required to stop publishing information about the files he used to hack into the PlayStation 3 was fair. This was because Hotz broke the law by hacking into the PlayStation 3 and deserved to be punished for it. I am of the opinion that he should have gotten a stricter punishment. The decision of the court to abide Sony to know all those who had visited Hotz website was not fair because it would infringe on the privacy of others. I do not think it was the visitors were on the wrong. They simply accessed information that had been put online for the public to