Human Cloning Essay -- Clones, Cloning Essays

re-create public has recently become a possibility. It is achieved by the production of a group of identical cells or organisms that all acquire from a single(a) individual (Grolier 220). It is non cognise when cl angiotensin converting enzyme hu domains beings really became a possibility, but it is known that there are deuce possible ship canal that we can clone homo. The first way involves split up an embryo into several(prenominal) halves and creating more new individuals from that embryo. The second method of re-create a human involves taking cells from an already existing human universe and cloning them, in turn creating other individuals that are identical to that point person. With these two methods well-nigh at our fingertips, we must ask ourselves two really important questions cannister we do this, and should we? There is no doubt that many problems involving the technological and good sides of this issue will arise and will be virtually insurmountable to avoid, but the overall estimation of cloning humans is one that we should stomach as a possible reality for the future. re-create humans is an idea that has always been thought of as something that could be ground in acquisition fiction novels, but never as a concept that smart set could actually experience. It is much in the news. The public has been bombarded with theme articles, magazine stories, records, tv set shows, and movies as well as cartoons, writes Robert McKinnell, the author of copy A biologist Reports (24). Much of this information in these sources leads the public in the wrong caution and makes them wonder how easy it would be for everyone around them to be cloned. Bizarre ideas close to cloning lie in many attainment fiction books and scare away the public with their unbelievable possibilities. David Rorvik wrote a highly disputed book authorize In His Image. In it he describes the story of a wealthy man who decides to clone himself. He is successfu l in doing this and causes instead an uprise in his community. This book was written in the late seventies and even then, societies reply to the issues of human cloning was generally a negative one. We face a problem today even greater than the one in this book and it involves the duplication of human beings in a company that has always been known for its diversity. The main issue as to whether or not human cloning is possible through the splitting of embryos began in 1993 when experiment was done at George W... ...nkind, Time (June 21-27) 63-76.Grolier, Thomas. Can We Still Talk. sassy York Chelsea theater of operations Publishers, 1994.Hamilton, Bernard. re-create of embryos. New York Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1991.Habgood, John. Manipulating mankind. Nature, Vol. 365 September 23, 1993 3 04.Kolberg, Rebecca. Human Embryo Cloning Reported. Science, October 29, 1993, Vol.262 652-653. McCormick, Richard A. Should we clone humans? Christian Century, November 17- 24, 1993 1148-1149. P. J. The pros and cons of freedom of access to human genome information, Nature, Vol. 333 June 23, 1988 692.McKinnell, Robert. Cloning A Biologist Reports. Boston Houghton Mifflin Company, 1989.Radford, Tim. Designing the Next Generation. dry land Press Review, work on 1994 22-23.Rorvik, David. In His Image. New York Harper & Row Publisher, 1992. Shah, Dilip M. design Herbicide gross profit in Transgenic Plants. Science, July 25, 1986 478. Watson, Traci. Seeking the wonder in a mote of dust. U.S. word of honor & World Report, October 3, 1994 66.Voelker, Roger B. Whos Afraid of the Human Genome? battle of Hastings Center Report, July/ imposing 1989 19-21. Human Cloning Essay -- Clones, Cloning EssaysCloning humans has recently become a possibility. It is achieved by the production of a group of identical cells or organisms that all derive from a single individual (Grolier 220). It is not known when cloning humans really became a possibi lity, but it is known that there are two possible ways that we can clone humans. The first way involves splitting an embryo into several halves and creating many new individuals from that embryo. The second method of cloning a human involves taking cells from an already existing human being and cloning them, in turn creating other individuals that are identical to that particular person. With these two methods almost at our fingertips, we must ask ourselves two very important questions Can we do this, and should we? There is no doubt that many problems involving the technological and ethical sides of this issue will arise and will be virtually impossible to avoid, but the overall idea of cloning humans is one that we should accept as a possible reality for the future. Cloning humans is an idea that has always been thought of as something that could be found in science fiction novels, but never as a concept that society could actually experience. It is much in the news. The public ha s been bombarded with newspaper articles, magazine stories, books, television shows, and movies as well as cartoons, writes Robert McKinnell, the author of Cloning A Biologist Reports (24). Much of this information in these sources leads the public in the wrong direction and makes them wonder how easy it would be for everyone around them to be cloned. Bizarre ideas about cloning lie in many science fiction books and scare the public with their unbelievable possibilities. David Rorvik wrote a highly controversial book entitled In His Image. In it he describes the story of a wealthy man who decides to clone himself. He is successful in doing this and causes quite an uprise in his community. This book was written in the late seventies and even then, societies reaction to the issues of human cloning was generally a negative one. We face a problem today even greater than the one in this book and it involves the duplication of human beings in a society that has always been known for its d iversity. The main issue as to whether or not human cloning is possible through the splitting of embryos began in 1993 when experimentation was done at George W... ...nkind, Time (June 21-27) 63-76.Grolier, Thomas. Can We Still Talk. New York Chelsea House Publishers, 1994.Hamilton, Bernard. Cloning of embryos. New York Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1991.Habgood, John. Manipulating mankind. Nature, Vol. 365 September 23, 1993 3 04.Kolberg, Rebecca. Human Embryo Cloning Reported. Science, October 29, 1993, Vol.262 652-653. McCormick, Richard A. Should we clone humans? Christian Century, November 17- 24, 1993 1148-1149. P. J. The pros and cons of freedom of access to human genome data, Nature, Vol. 333 June 23, 1988 692.McKinnell, Robert. Cloning A Biologist Reports. Boston Houghton Mifflin Company, 1989.Radford, Tim. Designing the Next Generation. World Press Review, March 1994 22-23.Rorvik, David. In His Image. New York Harper & Row Publisher, 1992. Shah, Dilip M. Eng ineering Herbicide Tolerance in Transgenic Plants. Science, July 25, 1986 478. Watson, Traci. Seeking the wonder in a mote of dust. U.S. News & World Report, October 3, 1994 66.Voelker, Roger B. Whos Afraid of the Human Genome? Hastings Center Report, July/August 1989 19-21.